You might remember not long ago that we looked at what it would take to land either Stone Brewing or Deschutes Brewery as both look to expand to the east coast. ( Now, most laugh this off and think that there is no way that South Carolina could ever hope to land either of these breweries or any other large brewery looking to expand east. And in the past, that has certainly been true. However, that is not the case any longer. Or at least it won’t be soon. Hope is on the horizon for South Carolina.

A team from the Department of Commerce and the South Carolina Brewers Association has been working extremely hard to open the doors for Stone, Deschutes, and any other brewery looking to move east (as well as to improve the existing laws for South Carolina breweries and brewpubs). Now, whether this hard work will pay off remains to be seen. After all, Stone and Deschutes could pass on South Carolina. And in the past, several breweries looking to move east have done so. But, such a decision will be a little harder this time, because South Carolina is about to kick down the regulatory door. How?

For lack of a better term, let’s call it “The Stone Bill”. You’ll recall that Stone has made it clear what they want to do:

“Our operations facility will feature a full-production brewery, packaging and distribution operations with various administrative support which will serve to produce beer to be distributed in the Midwest to East Coast Boundaries as well as for export. Our World Bistro & Gardens, retail and potential other operations will follow. . . . Once developed, the World Bistro and Gardens outside area will be beautifully landscaped where visitors will be able to enjoy craft beer, dine, and enjoy our gardens….”


Under South Carolina’s current regulatory scheme, such an operation is illegal. But, the Stone Bill would make this possible. Let’s talk about how it works.

Do you remember when we discussed the South Carolina law of brewpubs? You can view that here:

Ok, now forget all of that. To make Stone or Deschutes or someone else who runs a brewpub or restaurant a possibility, the law of brewpubs is about to change. And a big change it is. Here is the breakdown:

  • It will increase the amount of beer that a brewpub can change from 2,000 barrels per year to 500,000 barrels per year so as to accommodate large breweries with restaurants.
  • Like breweries, it will allow for sales to wholesalers and exporters of kegs, cans, and bottles.
  • It will allow bottles and cans to be sold on site. Currently, only bottles are allowed. Although, nobody does this.
  • It keeps the current rules in place for on-site consumption. Meaning, there’s no limit like the Pint Law.


In short, this might be the most progressive piece of beer legislation to ever come out of South Carolina, if not the South. This might even be the most progressive piece of brewpub legislation ever written in terms of barrels of beer to be produced. In terms of what brewpubs are allowed to produce nationally, this would put South Carolina well over the top. This sends a signal to national breweries that South Carolina is open for business. But, there is a problem. Time.

Session for the legislature ends in June. And this is the last year of the session, so the bill would not carry over. In other words, to get it done this year, the bill would have to make it through both houses before session ends. It might sound improbable, but with the potential for hundreds of jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars on the line, there is support to get this done now. Whether that will happen or not remains to be seen.

State government officials are now big believers in craft beer and its economic benefits. If it doesn’t get done this year, then there are indications that it would pass next session. While that might be too late for a Stone or Deschutes, it wouldn’t be too late for the next Stone or Deschutes or other entities in South Carolina. And there will be more.

Remember, that if passed, this bill benefits South Carolina brewpubs now. All existing South Carolina brewpubs would finally be able to distribute their beers and attend beer festivals. These are things that brewpubs have been wanting for a long time. It would also allow them to grow their businesses, hire more workers, and expand production.

I’ll post the bill as soon as it hits the legislature’s website. Like the Pint Bill, Senator Sean Bennett of Summerville will be a sponsor in the Senate. Derham Cole and Jim Merrill will be the lead House sponsors.

UPDATE: You can now read S. 1230 right here:

15 responses to “THE STONE BILL: WHAT IT DOES

  1. This is great to hear. What about the wholesalers? They (along with the Mike Fairs of the world) have stood in the way of progressive beer bills here recently, or at least have prevailed in watering them down. Any risk of that here? Or not so much because there’s no self-distribution clause?

    Speaking of that. I assume based on the example of CBX/Edmund’s Oast that brewpubs are classified as retailers rather than producers for purposes of the three-tier rule. That would mean any brewpub owner could open its own branded retail shops like Stone has in California. Yet, they’d have to first sell to a wholesaler and then buy their own beer back from them to put it in the store.

    I guess I shouldn’t get ahead of things; let’s just hope that becomes a problem to correct one day…

    • It is the result of negotiations with wholesalers. The portion on craft brewers was a major part of it. We’ll figure that out. Brewpubs are exceptions to three tier, but this changes things somewhat.

      • Unless I’m mistaken, a brewpub is not also required to serve food (unless it wants to serve spirits, just like any other bar would be). So, if this law were to pass, other than having a cap (and a large one, at that) on production, would there be any reason every brewer would not want to simply be licensed as a brewpub?

        So the brewpub permit costs $1,800 more than the brewery one does per year. You would easily make that up by not having the limit on pint sales, I would think.

        Then, if you wanted to, you could add foodservice and, except for the part about self-distribution, behave pretty much like a North Carolina brewery does.

  2. Reblogged this on Craft Beer Chick and commented:
    A new bill is on the way that could change the beer landscape in SC. See what’s being proposed in Brook Bristow’s excellent write-up. When more information becomes available about how to support this bill, I’ll be sure to share.

  3. Pingback: Rumors & Notes: 4/16/14 | Holy City Sinner·

  4. Pingback: Large craft breweries could soon come to S.C. thanks to proposed legislation - Charleston Real Estate News | Charleston Real Estate News·

  5. Pingback: Five Impressions for Friday | barsbeerssports·

  6. Pingback: Episode 27: Growers and Showers - The Craft Beercast·

  7. Pingback: Craft Beer Nation | South Carolina and Stone, beer legislation brewing in the State Senate·

  8. Pingback: Weekly Growler Fill | National Beer News Roundup·

  9. Pingback: Abnormal Interviews: Daniel Hartis, Author of “Beer Lover’s The Carolinas” | Abnormal Use·

  10. Pingback: Craft Beer’s Chance to Change Alcohol Culture in America | Beer VS Beer·

  11. uh BIG question. before the fee for this was something like $3000, not bad if you are just wanting to have your own local pub, but for micro breweries and big brewers it was much larger like $50,000 or something if i remember. but since a brewpub can now make 500,000 barrels will the fee remain the same. If not and the price rises proporation to the potential production this means yes, we might get a stone or whatever but not getting any small local brewpubs.

    • This was the original language for the bill. What it ended up being is completely different. What fee? Breweries and brewpubs pay license fees to the state. $400 for a brewery. $2,200 for a brewpub. Those license fees aren’t changing.

  12. Pingback: Something we can all cheers 🍻 to – GVLToday·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s